Autoimmune encephalitis related to nivolumab followed by tumor regression / Encefalitis autoinmune relacionada con nivolumab se guida de regresión tumoral

Abstract Immune checkpoints inhibitors have shown a re markable improvement in overall survival of stage IV renal cell carcinoma patients. Nevertheless, there is a wide range of immune-related adverse events (IRAE) that arise from these revolutionary treatments. Autoim mune encephalitis is a rare but severe central nervous system IRAE in these cancer patients. The severities of these IRAEs preclude patients from continuing im munotherapy treatment. Few cases of autoimmune encephalitis with immunotherapy have been described in the literature and optimal clinical management of these events as well as patient's immune-mediated response after treatment suspension is still unclear. Here, we report a case of a 67 years-old woman with stage IV renal cell carcinoma under treatment with nivolumab who developed autoimmune encephalitis. After high doses of corticosteroids patient's condition improved significantly with full recovery after 5 days of treatment. Even though nivolumab was not reinstalled, a persistent response of her oncologic disease was evi denced. We expect that this case can contribute to the existing literature of both subjects, the management of autoimmune encephalitis as grade IV immune related adverse event and the responses of immune checkpoint inhibitors after IRAE.

Resumen Los inhibidores de puntos de control inmunológico han mostrado una importante mejoría en la supervi vencia global de los pacientes con carcinoma de riñón estadio IV. Sin embargo, existe una amplia variedad de efectos adversos inmunomediados que surgen a partir de estos tratamientos revolucionarios. La encefalitis au toinmune es un infrecuente pero grave efecto adverso inmunomediado del sistema nervioso central en estos pacientes. La gravedad de este cuadro impide que los pa cientes continúen con el tratamiento de inmunoterapia. Se han descrito pocos casos de encefalitis autoinmune con inmunoterapia en la literatura y aún no está claro el manejo clínico óptimo de estos eventos, ni cómo continua la respuesta inmunomediada después de la suspensión del tratamiento. Presentamos el caso de una mujer de 67 años con carcinoma de células renales estadio IV que desarrolló encefalitis autoinmune durante el tratamiento con nivolumab. La paciente mejoró significativamente luego del inicio del tratamiento con altas dosis de cor ticoides, con una recuperación completa después de 5 días del mismo. Si bien el nivolumab no se reinició, se evidenció una respuesta persistente de su enfermedad oncológica. Esperamos que este caso pueda contribuir a la literatura existente de ambos temas, el manejo de la encefalitis autoinmune como efecto adverso inmunome diado grado IV y las respuestas que se obtienen con la inmunoterapia luego de estos efectos adversos.

Nivolumab rechallenge after severe immune hepatitis in a metastatic renal cell cancer patient with hepatitis B and no detectable primary

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an aggressive tumor with high metastatic potential and most of cases are determined incidentally on radiologic imaging. Metastatic RCC (mRCC) without a primary is very rare, and only a small number of cases have been reported in the literature. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been used to treat mRCC, but they are associated with immune-related adverse events. Immune hepatitis is rare and usually observed within three months of initiation of therapy. Patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection have generally been excluded from immunotherapy trials, although a small number of reports and retrospective studies exist on the use of immunotherapy in patients with HBV infection. A 59-year-old man was diagnosed with mRCC with adrenal and liver metastases and vena cava inferior thrombosis but without evidence of a primary. Second-line therapy with nivolumab achieved a good clinical response, but grade IV immune-related hepatitis was observed after one year. He also had an occult HBV infection. However, HBV reactivation did not occur with continuous entecavir prophylaxis. The hepatitis gradually resolved within two months without any management, and the patient was rechallenged with nivolumab. Metastatic RCC rarely presents without a primary mass in the kidney. In such cases, histologic and immunohistochemical characteristics are critical. Nivolumab-induced immune hepatitis may occur as late as one year after initiation of therapy. Rechallenge of immunotherapy may be considered in selected patients. HBV infection is not a contraindication for immunotherapy, these patients can be treated safely with frequent monitoring and antiviral prophylaxis

Dabrafenib plus trametinib versus nivolumab for advanced melanoma / Dabrafenib más trametinib versus nivolumab para el tratamiento del melanoma avanzado

Introduction The incidence of cutaneous melanoma has increased worldwide over the years, and an incidence of 3 cases per 100,000 men and women is estimated in Chile. Though most of the patients are diagnosed at an early stage of the disease and have a good prognosis, advanced melanoma has poor survival results. For the treatment of melanoma, the combination of dabrafenib plus trametinib has been demonstrated to improve the outcome versus dabrafenib alone, but only indirect evidence is available for its efficacy and safety compared with immunotherapy, like nivolumab. The aim of this study is to review the available evidence to report results of efficacy and safety of dabrafenib plus trametinib in comparison with nivolumab in metastatic melanoma. Methods We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews selected, reanalyzed data of primary studies, and generated a summary of the findings table using the GRADE approach. Results and conclusions We identified five systematic reviews, including seven studies overall that included one intervention of our interest, of which all were randomized trials. We only found indirect evidence comparing dabrafenib plus trametinib versus nivolumab that came from Network Meta-Analyses. We concluded that it is not possible to decide if dabrafenib plus trametinib is a better strategy for advanced melanoma treatment than nivolumab because the certainty of the evidence is very low for efficacy and safety outcomes.

Introducción La incidencia de melanoma cutáneo ha aumentado a nivel mundial con el paso de los años, estimándose en Chile una incidencia de 3 casos por 100.000 hombres y mujeres. Aunque la mayoría de los pacientes son diagnosticados en etapas tempranas de la enfermedad y tienen un buen pronóstico, el melanoma avanzado tiene malos resultados de sobrevida. Para el tratamiento del melanoma, se ha demostrado que la combinación de dabrafenib más trametinib mejora el resultado frente a dabrafenib solo, pero sólo se dispone de evidencia indirecta sobre su eficacia y seguridad en comparación con la inmunoterapia, como nivolumab. Métodos Se realizaron búsquedas en Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, que se mantiene mediante el cribado de múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Se extrajeron los datos de las revisiones sistemáticas seleccionadas, se reanalizaron los datos de los estudios primarios y se generó una tabla de resumen de los hallazgos utilizando el enfoque GRADE. Resultados y conclusiones Se identificaron cinco revisiones sistemáticas, incluyendo siete estudios en total que incluían una intervención de nuestro interés, de los cuales todos eran ensayos aleatorizados. Se concluyó que no es posible decidir si dabrafenib más trametinib es una mejor estrategia para el tratamiento del melanoma avanzado que nivolumab porque la certeza de las pruebas es muy baja para los resultados de eficacia y seguridad.

Practice and analysis of clinical pharmacist participating in the treatment of a case of acanthoma caused by navulizumab / 中国药房

This paper reports the clinical pharmacist participated in the diagnosis and treatment of a patient with acanthoma caused by nivolumab. This patient developed acanthoma 2 weeks after medication， involving scalp， neck， trunk， back of hand， sole of foot and other parts， with moderate pruritus. The clinical pharmacist determined it as “yes” according to the causality evaluation method of adverse reactions. After reviewing the literature， clinical pharmacists found that acanthoma caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors was more commonly seen in male elderly patients with malignant melanoma， and mainly involved the trunk， extremities and hands. Under the general principle of considering the effectiveness， safety， economy and accessibility of therapeutic drugs， the clinical pharmacist finally decided to give the patient a comprehensive treatment scheme of Halometasone cream for external use + oral administration of Retinoic acid capsules + oral administration of Ebastine tablets after discussion with the doctor， with maximum respect for the patient’s wishes，and continued to use navulizumab for immunotherapy. At the same time， pharmaceutical care and psychological counseling were conducted by clinical pharmacist. Finally， the patient successfully completed the treatment， and the acanthoma gradually subsided after the end of navulizumab treatment. The diagnosis and treatment process of this patient indicated that the participation of clinical pharmacists is helpful to improve the continuity and safety of immunotherapy.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors for glioblastoma: what have we learned? / Inibidores de checkpoint imunológico para glioblastoma: o que aprendemos?

ABSTRACT Background: Glioblastoma, the most common malignant primary brain tumor, remains a lethal disease with few therapeutic options. Immunotherapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi), have revolutionized cancer treatment, but their role in glioblastoma is uncertain. Objective: To review the state of immunotherapies in glioblastoma, with an emphasis on recently published ICPi clinical trials. Methods: In this editorial/opinion article, we critically review results of the first generation of trials of ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab in glioblastoma, as well as future directions. Results: Expression of PD-L1 is frequent in glioblastoma, ranging from 60-70% of patients. Phase 1 studies of nivolumab with and without ipilimumab, as well as pembrolizumab, showed no new safety concerns in brain tumors, and no neurotoxicity. However, randomized phase 3 trials of nivolumab showed no survival improvements over bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma; no role in newly diagnosed disease as a replacement for temozolomide in unmethylated MGMT promoter tumors; and no benefit as an addition to temozolomide in methylated MGMT tumors. However, studies examining post treatment tumor samples have shown signs of increased immunologic response, and occasional long lasting radiographic responses have been seen. A small study of pembrolizumab suggested a potential role as a "neoadjuvant" treatment in resectable recurrent glioblastoma, while other studies are investigating selection of patients with higher mutational burden and novel agents and combinatorial strategies. Conclusion: Despite initial negative trials, immunotherapy remains of high interest in glioblastoma, and many trials are still ongoing. Improving our mechanistic understanding of the immunosuppression and T cell dysfunction induced by both tumor and the CNS microenvironment remains however crucial for the development of successful immunotherapeutic approaches in this disease.

RESUMO Antecedentes: Glioblastoma é o tumor cerebral primário maligno mais comum e continua sendo uma doença letal com poucas opções terapêuticas. As imunoterapias, em especial, os inibidores de checkpoint imunológico (ICPi), revolucionaram o tratamento do câncer, mas seu papel no glioblastoma é incerto. Objetivo: Revisar o estado atual do papel das imunoterapias no glioblastoma, com ênfase nos ensaios clínicos ICPi publicados recentemente. Métodos: Neste artigo de revisão, analisamos criticamente os resultados da primeira geração de estudos de ipilimumab, nivolumab e pembrolizumab em glioblastoma, bem como as perspectivas futuras. Resultados: A expressão de PD-L1 é frequente no glioblastoma, variando de 60-70% dos pacientes. Estudos de fase 1 de nivolumab com e sem ipilimumab, bem como pembrolizumab, não revelaram novas questões de tolerabilidade nem neurotoxicidade. No entanto, ensaios randomizados de fase 3 de nivolumab não apontaram melhorias na sobrevida em relação ao bevacizumab em glioblastoma recorrente, nenhum papel na doença recém-diagnosticada como substituto da temozolomida em tumores promotores de MGMT não metilados e nenhum benefício como adição à temozolomida em tumores MGMT metilados. No entanto, estudos que examinaram amostras de tumores pós-tratamento mostraram sinais de aumento da resposta imunológica, e respostas radiográficas ocasionais de longa duração foram observadas. Um pequeno estudo de pembrolizumab sugeriu um papel potencial como tratamento "neoadjuvante" no glioblastoma recorrente ressecável, ao passo que outros estudos estão investigando a seleção de pacientes com maior carga mutacional e novos agentes e estratégias combinatórias. Conclusão: Apesar dos ensaios iniciais negativos, a imunoterapia continua sendo de grande interesse no glioblastoma, e muitos ensaios ainda estão em andamento. No entanto, melhorar a nossa compreensão dos mecanismos de imunossupressão e disfunção das células T induzidas tanto pelo tumor quanto pelo microambiente do SNC continua sendo crucial para o desenvolvimento de abordagens imunoterapêuticas bem-sucedidas nesta doença.

Economic evaluation of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab in the first-line treatment of unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab in the first-line treatment of unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma （MPM）. METHODS From the perspective of healthcare system ，a partitioned survival model were developed ，the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab （dual-immunotherapy plan ）versus chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of unresectable MPM by cost-utility analysis. Clinical trial data were collected from CheckMate 743 study. Direct medical cost included drug costs ，disease management cost and cost of treatment of adverse reactions. Costs and utilities were discounted at an annual rate of 5％. The willingness to pay threshold was 3 times of gross domestic product （GDP）per capita in 2021 [242 928 yuan/QALY（quality-adjusted life year ）]. Scenario analysis was used to analyze and compare the two regimens under the scenario of complimentary drug for patients in dual-immunotherapy group. The robustness of the findings was evaluated by one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS Baseline analysis results showed that total cost of dual-immunotherapy regimen was higher than that of chemotherapy regimen ，and the utility was also better than that of chemotherapy plan ；the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio （ICER）was 417 122.2 yuan/QALY，which was higher than the willingness to pay threshold ；the dual-immunotherapy regimen was not cost-effective compared to the chemotherapy regimen. Under the scenario of complimentary drug ，the cost of dual-immunotherapy was 327 454.5 yuan，ICER was 75 664.1 yuan/QALY，which was lower than the willingness to pay threshold and resulted in a reversal of the baseline analysis. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that under the health states of progression free survival and progressive disease ，utility value and the price of nivolumab had a greater impact on the ICER value. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the results of baseline analysis were robust. CONCLUSIONS At a 163.com willingness to pay threshold of 3 times of GDP per capita in nivolumab combined with ipilimumab is not cost-effective compared with chemotherapy regimen in the first-line treatment of unresectable MPM. However ，if patients receive complimentary drugs ，the dual-immunotherapy regimen is cost-effective.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab in the second-line treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To ev aluate the economical efficiency of nivolumab versus everolimus in the second-line treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. METHODS From the perspective of China ’s health system ，cost-effectiveness analysis of the two therapies was carried out by developing a three-state partitioned survival model. The clinical parameters were from the updated CheckMate 025 study，and the cost and health utility were from relevant websites and published literatures. The model adopted a 2-week cycle and a lifetime research time. The robustness of the results was verified by sensitivity analysis. The economical efficiency of two therapy schemes were evaluated in the scenario of model simulation time of 80 months and charitable drug donation scheme. RESULTS The results of basic analysis showed that compared with everolimus ，the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio （ICER）of nivolumab was 586 982.60 yuan/quality-adjusted life year （QALY），which was far higher than 3 times of China ’s per capita gross domestic product （GDP）in 2020. The results of single-factor sensitivity analysis showed that the 3 parameters that had the greatest impact on the economic evaluation results were the cost of nivolumab ，the utility value of nivolumab group and everolimus group in progressive disease state. The results of probability sensitivity analysis verified the robustness of the basic analysis results. Results of scenario analysis showed that in the first scenario analysis ，in which model simulation time lasted for 80 months，ICER of nivolumab was 417 204.52 yuan/QALY；in the second scenario analysis ，in which nivolumab charitable drug donation program for low-income people was considered ，ICER of nivolumab was 124 988.58 yuan/QALY. CONCLUSIONS Under the threshold of 1-3 times of China ’s per capita GDP in 2020，compared with everolimus ，it is not economical to use nivolumab as the second-line treatment for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma ； nivolumab is economical when considering its charitable drug donation program for low-income people.

Treatment Sequencing Strategies in Lung Cancer / 中国肺癌杂志

BACKGROUND@#The advances in the lung cancer screening methods and therapeutics, together with awareness towards deleterious habits, such as smoking, is increasing the overall survival with better quality of life for the patients. However, lung cancer is still one of the most common and fatal neoplasm with a high incidence and consequently burden to public health worldwide. Thus, based on guidelines and recent phases II and III clinical trials studies, this manuscript summarizes the current treatment sequencing strategies in lung cancer.@*METHODS@#A comprehensive search of related articles was performed focused on phases II and III clinical trials studies.@*RESULTS@#The lung cancer management should take into consideration the tumor characteristics, histology, molecular pathology and be discussed in a multidisciplinary team. Lung cancer treatment options comprises surgery whenever possible, radiotherapy associate with/or chemotherapy and immunotherapy as monotherapy, or combined with chemotherapy and best palliative care.@*CONCLUSIONS@#The screening predictability in more patients, smoking reduction, early diagnosis, better disease understanding and individualized, more effective and tolerable therapeutics are related to an increasing in overall survival and quality of life. In the near future improvement of personalized therapy in precision medicine is expected, enhancing new predictive biomarkers, optimal doses and optimal treatment sequencing as well as anti-cancer vaccines development.

ANÁLISE DA EFICÁCIA DO NIVOLUMAB NO TRATAMENTO DE CÂNCER DE PULMÃO DE NÃO PEQUENAS CÉLULAS / ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NIVOLUMAB IN THE TREATMENT OF NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER

A neoplasia maligna do pulmão é um dos tipos mais comuns e graves de câncer, sendo o que mais leva ao óbito em todo o mundo. O risco para o desenvolvimento desta doença depende da interação entre a exposição ao agente e a suscetibilidade individual para seu aparecimento. Acomete mais o sexo masculino e seu principal fator predisponente é o tabagismo. O objetivo deste artigo consiste em discutir a eficácia do medicamento Nivolumab no tratamento de câncer de pulmão de células não pequenas e evidenciar a imunoterapia como um tratamento promissor do câncer. Para tal, foi realizado um levantamento bibliográfico, utilizando-se como descritor: fatores de risco, câncer de pulmão, câncer de pulmão de não pequenas células em livros, artigos e revistas nas seguintes bases de dados: SCIELO, ANVISA, Periódicos da CAPES, Google Acadêmico. Em seguida, foi feita uma leitura analítica para ordenar as informações e identificar o objeto de estudo. Podemos perceber que a imunoterapia é bastante promissora, não só no tratamento do câncer de pulmão, como em muitos outros. O medicamento estudado, nivolumab, obteve ótimos resultados no tratamento de CPNPC, porém é notório que ainda falta estímulo para que o mesmo seja utilizado como primeira opção no tratamento de segunda linha do CPNPC.

Malignant neoplasm of the lung is one of the most common and serious types of cancer, and is the most deadly in the world. The risk for the development of this disease depends on the interaction between the exposure to the agent and the individual susceptibility to its onset. It affects males more and its main predisposing factor is smoking. The objective of this article is to discuss the efficacy of the drug Nivolumab in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and to evidence immunotherapy as a promising treatment for cancer. For that, a bibliographic survey was carried out, using as descriptor: risk factors, lung cancer, non-small cell lung cancer in books, articles and journals in the following databases: SCIELO, ANVISA, CAPES Periodicals, Google Scholar. Then, an analytical reading was made to sort the information and identify the object of study. We can see that immunotherapy is very promising, not only in the treatment of lung cancer, but also in many others. The medicament studied, nivolumab, obtained excellent results in the treatment of NSCLC, but it is well known that there is still a lack of stimulation for it to be used as the first option in the second line treatment of NSCLC.

Uso de nivolumab en pacientes con recaída postrasplante alogénico de progenitores hematopoyéticos en enfermedad de Hodgkin: reporte de dos casos clínicos

Hodgkin's Lymphoma has a very good prognosis. In the unusually refractory patients allogeneic transplantation offers a chance of cure. The so-called checkpoint inhibitors, such as Nivolumab can play a relevant role in this type of patients. Their side effects and usefulness after allogeneic transplantation are under investigation. Relapse after allogeneic transplantation has an extremely poor prognosis. We report two patients with refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma who relapsed after an allogeneic transplant and who were successfully treated with Nivolumab.

Immunotherapy-based first-line treatment of intermediate- and poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma: number needed to treat and cost of preventing an event from the perspective of the Brazilian private healthcare system / Tratamento baseado em imunoterapia para primeira linha do carcinoma renal avançado com risco intermediário ou alto: número necessário a tratar e custo para prevenir um evento na perspectiva do sistema privado de saúde brasileiro

Objective: To perform an analysis over time of the number needed to treat (NNT) and the cost of preventing an event (COPE) for nivolumab + ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) and pembrolizumab + axitinib (PEMBRO+AXI) as first-line treatments for advanced renal cell carcinoma patients with intermediate or poor-risk, under the Brazilian private healthcare system perspective. Methods: The NNT for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from 12-month to maximum available follow-up from CheckMate 214 and KEYNOTE-426 studies were used to estimate the COPE. Treatment costs were estimated considering the labeled dosing and median PFS as a proxy for treatment duration. Results: The OS NNT for NIVO+IPI decreased from 12 to 8 and for PEMBRO+AXI increased slightly from 7 to 8 at 12 and 42 months, respectively. For PFS, NNT for NIVO+IPI decreased from 15 to 6, and for PEMBRO+AXI increased from 7 to 10 at 12 and 30 months. The estimated treatment cost is R$ 638,620 for an estimated median of 11.2 months of NIVO+IPI treatment and R$ 966,818 for 13.8 months of PEMBRO+AXI treatment. COPE for OS at 12 and 42 months was R$ 7,663,440 and R$ 5,108,960 with NIVO+IPI and R$ 6,047,417 and R$ 7,734,547 with PEMBRO+AXI. For PFS, COPE at 12 and 30 months was R$ 9,579,300 and R$ 3,831,720 with NIVO+IPI and R$ 6,047,417 and R$ 9,668,184 with PEMBRO+AXI. Conclusions: Treatment with NIVO+IPI results in lower COPE than PEMBRO+AXI from month 18 onwards, driven by lower treatment costs and improved NNT over time with NIVO+IPI

Objetivo: Analisar ao longo do tempo o número necessário a tratar (NNT) e o custo para prevenir um evento (COPE) para nivolumabe + ipilimumabe (NIVO+IPI) e pembrolizumabe + axitinibe (PEMBRO+AXI) na primeira linha de tratamento do carcinoma de células renais avançado com risco intermediário ou alto na perspectiva do sistema suplementar de saúde brasileiro. Métodos: O NNT para sobrevida global (SG) e sobrevida livre de progressão (SLP) para 12 meses até o máximo de tempo de seguimento disponível dos estudos CheckMate 214 e KEYNOTE-426 foi usado para estimar o COPE. Custos de tratamento foram estimados considerando a dosagem em bula e a mediana de SLP como aproximação para duração de tratamento. Resultados: O NNT de SG para NIVO+IPI reduziu de 12 para 8 e para PEMBRO+AXI subiu de 7 para 8 em 12 e 42 meses, respectivamente. Para SLP, NIVO+IPI teve redução de 15 para 6 e para PEMBRO+AXI aumentou de 7 para 10 em 12 e 30 meses. O custo estimado é de R$ 638.620 para mediana de 11,2 meses de tratamento com NIVO+IPI e de R$ 966.818 para 13,8 meses com PEMBRO+AXI. O COPE para SG foi de R$ 7.663.440 e R$ 5.108.960 com NIVO+IPI e de R$ 6.047.417 e R$ 7.734.547 com PEMBRO+AXI para 12 e 42 meses. Para SLP, foi de R$ 9.579.300 e R$ 3.831.720 com NIVO+IPI e de R$ 6.047.417 e R$ 9.668.184 com PEMBRO+AXI em 12 e 30 meses. Conclusões: O tratamento com NIVO+IPI resulta em menor COPE, em comparação com PEMBRO+AXI, a partir de 18 meses de seguimento, justificado por menor custo de tratamento e melhora do NNT ao longo do tempo com NIVO+IPI

Clinical research progress for nivolumab in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer / 中国肿瘤临床

The gastric cancer incidence rate is the highest in East Asia and South and Central America. The rates are particularly high in Japan and Korea, where gastric cancer is the main cause of death in men, and in China, where gastric cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Presently, the 5-year survival rate of advanced gastric cancer is estimated to be approximately 5%-20%, and there is no effective treatment. Immunotargeting drugs can reverse the immune escape associated with the immune checkpoint pathway, thus changing the treatment strategy for patients with advanced gastric cancer. As a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody designed to bind programmed death-1 (PD-1) and block the interaction between PD-1 and its ligand, nivolumab was the first immune-checkpoint inhibitor approved for gastric cancer in China. This drug made a breakthrough in the“shortage of the posterior line”in the treatment of gastric cancer in China. In this paper, the mechanism of action, clinical trials, immune-related adverse events, hyper-progressive disease, pseudo-progression of the tumor, biomarkers, and other aspects of the latest research progress on nivolumab are reviewed.

Immunotherapy of recurrence and metastasis after liver transplantation for liver cancer / 器官移植

Primary liver cancer (liver cancer) is one of the main indications of liver transplantation in China. Nevertheless, the 5-year survival rate of liver transplant recipients is lower than 50%. Recurrence and metastasis after operation are the main causes affecting the long-term survival of the recipients. At present, immunotherapy, represented by programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1)/programmed cell death protein-ligand 1(PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitor, has achieved remarkable clinical efficacy in the treatment of middle-stage and advanced liver cancer. However, whether it can be applied in recipients with recurrence and metastasis after liver transplantation for liver cancer remains controversial. The main reason is that it may cause acute rejection at the same time. In this article, the research progresses on the application of immunotherapy in recipients with recurrence and metastasis after liver transplantation for liver cancer were reviewed, aiming to improve the survival rate of recipients undergoing liver transplantation forliver cancer.

Nivolumab-associated pulmonary toxicities： a retrospective study based on FARES database from 2016 to 2019 / 上海预防医学

Objective:Nivolumab is one of the most common programmed death 1 （PD-1） inhibitors used as an immune checkpoint inhibitor （ICI）. It brings significant therapeutic effects but often accompanied by serious drug toxicity. The pulmonary toxicities of nivolumab are not clear. This study aims to systematically explore the nivolumab-associated pulmonary toxicities and provide reference for clinical treatment. Methods:Data were extracted from US Food and Drug Administration （FDA） Adverse Event Reporting System （FAERS） database from January 1， 2016 to September 30， 2019. Two types of disproportionality analysis， information component （IC） and reporting odds ratio （ROR）， were applied in nivolumab-associated pulmonary adverse events （AEs） signal detection. Results:A total of 28 489 309 records were extracted from FAERS database and 8 181 records were associated with nivolumab. Analysis was conducted in 179 AEs and 86 signals were detected. Notably， potent signals were detected in radiation pneumonitis （IC025： 3.99， ROR025： 17.25）， pneumonitis （IC025： 3.34， ROR025： 10.64） and bronchial fistula （IC025： 2.94， ROR025： 8.78）. Nivolumab-associated pulmonary toxicities were more frequently reported in dyspnoea （IC025： 0.50， ROR025： 1.44）， pneumonia （IC025： 0.08， ROR025： 1.07） and pneumonitis （IC025： 3.34， ROR025： 10.64）. Results of IC and ROR methods were similar to each other. Most pulmonary toxicities were observed in patients with non-small cell lung cancer （N=3 711， 32.13%）， malignant melanoma （N=1 658， 14.36%） and renal cell carcinoma （N=731， 6.33%）. Conclusion:Significant pulmonary toxicities were detected in patients treated with nivolumab. Thus， it is highly important for clinicians to be vigilant about nivolumab-associated pulmonary AEs and be prepared to take immediate action for patient safety.

Role of PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway in immune response of liver transplantation / 器官移植

Primary liver cancer (liver cancer) is one of the main indications of liver transplantation. However, postoperative recurrence of liver cancer severely affects the long-term clinical efficacy of liver transplantation. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) is an immunosuppressive molecule. Activation of PD-1/programmed cell death protein-ligand 1 (PD-L1) signaling pathway plays a pivotal role in the immune tolerance of grafts. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI), such as PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor, has become one of the effective approaches to treat advanced liver cancer, whereas ICI can be applied in liver transplant recipients is highly controversial, and the efficacy and safety remain to be studied. In this article, the expression of PD-1/PD-L1 in liver allograft tissues, the mechanism of PD-1/PD-L1 inducing transplantation immune tolerance and clinical application of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor in liver transplantation for liver cancer were reviewed.

Safety of PD-1 inhibitor in preoperative treatment of liver transplantation for liver cancer / 器官移植

Objective To evaluate the safety of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor in the treatment of primary liver cancer (liver cancer) before liver transplantation. Methods Clinical data of 7 recipients given with PD-1 inhibitor before liver transplantation for liver cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence of immune-related adverse event (irAE) and clinical prognosis of the recipients were summarized. The safety of PD-1 inhibitor in recipients prior to liver transplantation for liver cancer was evaluated. Results Seven recipients were treated with PD-1 inhibitor with 1-20 courses before liver transplantation for liver cancer. The time interval from drug withdrawal to liver transplantation was 6-120 d. Five recipients suffered from irAE of different degrees, including fatigue in 3 cases, fever in 2 cases, alopecia in 2 cases, rash in 1 case, nausea in 1 case and myocarditis in 1 case, respectively. A majority of these irAE were classified as grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ. One recipient died from grade Ⅴ irAE (fatal myocarditis). One recipient developed rejection at postoperative 7 d, which were mitigated after glucocorticoid pulse therapy combined with increased dosage of tacrolimus. Conclusions PD-1 inhibitor can be applied in preoperative treatment before liver transplantation for liver cancer. Nevertheless, the incidence of irAE and postoperative rejection should be intimately monitored.

Research progress on programmed death receptor 1/ ligand 1 inhibitor in immunotherapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma / 口腔疾病防治

@#Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a common malignant tumor that seriously threatens human health and life. With increasing studies on the mechanism of tumor immune escape, programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand receptor 1 (PD-L1) have been proven to be involved in tumor immune escape. The primary mechanism is that PD-1 recruits protein tyrosine phosphatase (SHP-2) to dephosphorylate downstream tyrosine kinase (SyK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), thereby inhibiting downstream protein kinase B (AKT), extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERK) and other important signaling pathways, ultimately inhibiting T cell activation. In recent years, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have become popular immunotherapies. Pembrolizumab and nivolumab have been approved for HNSCC patients by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Both durvalumab and atezolizumab are still in clinical trials, and published data show that both have certain safety and efficacy but still need much clinical data to support them. Meanwhile, the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy is still controversial in terms of clinical efficacy and adverse events, and further research is needed. However, serious immune-related adverse reactions limit the clinical application of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, despite promising curative effects. Therefore, developing novel inhibitors and investigating stable and effective biomarkers and upstream and downstream signaling mechanisms are urgent issues.

Long-term survival of a patient with programmed death ligand 1-negative lung adenocarcinoma and oligoprogressive disease treated with nivolumab and stereotactic body radiation therapy

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors have shown to prolong survival in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is associated with a higher probability of response, although some patients with PD-L1 negative tumors may also respond or show durable stabilizations. However, the optimal strategy after progression to immunotherapy (IO) is not yet defined. Patients with oligometastatic disease may benefit from local treatments such as radiotherapy (RT), achieving significant local control rates. In addition, RT is claimed to have numerous immunogenic effects that could synergize with IO. We present the case of a complete responder to nivolumab that after a monotopic adrenal relapse received stereotactic body radiation therapy, followed by maintenance nivolumab achieving a partial response that is still ongoing. Aspects such as mechanisms of acquired resistance to PD-L1 inhibitors, the optimal management after progression, and the potential interplay between IO and RT are briefly reviewed and discussed

Checkpoint inhibitors in advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer; a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have improved survival compared to chemotherapy alone in advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This article aims to compare indirect evidence and rank the effect of different CPIs in this setting. Materials and Methods: In this network meta-analysis, we searched for trials comparing CPIs in advanced NSCLC. Figures for survival endpoints were extracted. In addition, a network meta-regression analysis was carried out. Results: A total of 9220 patients from 16 trials were included in the analysis. In the first-line setting, for the overall survival endpoint, the chemotherapy + Pembrolizumab combination had the highest effectivity rank probability as compared to chemotherapy (hazard ratio = 0.788, 95% credential interval = 0.728–0.855). For the second-line setting, and also for the efficacy in terms of progression-free survival, various CPIs and their combinations were ranked. Conclusion: Some degree of differences in terms of efficacy exists between different types, dosages, settings, and combinations of CPI. We quantify these differences to guide clinical practice

Research progress on the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with nivolumab / 中国肿瘤临床

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for >85% of all cancer deaths. Although chemotherapy and targeted therapy have improved clinical outcomes, prognosis remains poor. With the development of immunotherapy, the treatment strategy for patients with NSCLC has changed. Nivolumab, a human immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody, was the first programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor drug to be approved for treating advanced NSCLC and has become the primary drug for treating advanced NSCLC. However, there remains a lack of clinical biomarkers to predict the efficacy of nivolumab. In this review, we discuss the progress of therapeutic mechanisms, pharmacokinetics, pharmacology, clinical trials of monotherapy and combined therapy, adverse events, and predictive biomarkers.